Implement anonymous variables and the `*_void` opcodes
That was more difficult than I expected. The shitty part was that we have to
thread the anonymous variables way the hell down into the register allocation
phase. I took the opportunity to refactor a bit so further things like this
shouldn't be quite so bad.
author |
Steve Losh <steve@stevelosh.com> |
date |
Mon, 04 Jul 2016 23:35:08 +0000 |
parents |
792dfa2f9120 |
children |
23d4dc2900a1 |
(in-package #:bones.wam)
(deftype cell ()
`(unsigned-byte ,+cell-width+))
(deftype cell-tag ()
`(unsigned-byte ,+cell-tag-width+))
(deftype cell-value ()
`(unsigned-byte ,+cell-value-width+))
(deftype store-index ()
`(integer 0 ,(1- +store-limit+)))
(deftype heap-index ()
`(integer ,+heap-start+ ,(1- +store-limit+)))
(deftype stack-index ()
`(integer ,+stack-start+ ,(1- +stack-end+)))
(deftype trail-index ()
`(integer 0 ,(1- +trail-limit+)))
(deftype register-index ()
`(integer 0 ,(1- +register-count+)))
(deftype functor-index ()
`(integer 0 ,(1- +functor-limit+)))
(deftype arity ()
`(integer 0 ,+maximum-arity+))
(deftype functor ()
'(cons symbol arity))
(deftype code-word ()
`(unsigned-byte ,+code-word-size+))
(deftype code-index ()
;; either an address or the sentinel
`(integer 0 ,(1- +code-limit+)))
(deftype opcode ()
`(integer 0 ,(1- +number-of-opcodes+)))
(deftype stack-frame-size ()
`(integer 4 ,+stack-frame-size-limit+))
(deftype stack-choice-size ()
;; TODO: is this actually right? check on frame size limit vs choice point
;; size limit...
`(integer 7 ,+stack-frame-size-limit+))
(deftype stack-frame-argcount ()
'arity)
(deftype continuation-pointer ()
'code-index)
(deftype environment-pointer ()
'stack-index)
(deftype backtrack-pointer ()
'stack-index)
(deftype stack-frame-word ()
'(or
environment-pointer ; CE
continuation-pointer ; CP
stack-frame-argcount ; N
cell)) ; Yn
(deftype stack-choice-word ()
'(or
environment-pointer ; CE
backtrack-pointer ; B
continuation-pointer ; CP, BP
stack-frame-argcount ; N
trail-index ; TR
heap-index ; H
cell)) ; An
(deftype stack-word ()
'(or stack-frame-word stack-choice-word))
;;;; Sanity Checks
;;; The values on the WAM stack are a bit of a messy situation. The WAM store
;;; is defined as an array of cells, but certain things on the stack aren't
;;; actually cells (e.g. the stored continuation pointer).
;;;
;;; This shouldn't be a problem (aside from being ugly) as long as our `cell`
;;; type is big enough to hold the values of these non-cell things. So let's
;;; just make sure that's the case...
(defun sanity-check-stack-type (type)
(assert (subtypep type 'cell) ()
"Type ~A is too large to fit into a cell!"
type)
(values))
(sanity-check-stack-type 'stack-frame-argcount)
(sanity-check-stack-type 'environment-pointer)
(sanity-check-stack-type 'continuation-pointer)
(sanity-check-stack-type 'backtrack-pointer)
(sanity-check-stack-type 'trail-index)
(sanity-check-stack-type 'stack-word)