Finish basic proving
I gave up on making the renameless unification work because I'm just too dumb to
understand it. Gonna throw this all away when I hit the WAM book anyhow, so
it's not worth wasting time on. Maybe I'll come back to it later if I have
time.
author |
Steve Losh <steve@stevelosh.com> |
date |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:22:56 +0000 |
parents |
1340243d4843 |
children |
d280326feecc |
(in-package #:bones.paip)
;;;; Types
(deftype logic-variable ()
'symbol)
(deftype binding ()
'(cons logic-variable t))
(deftype binding-list ()
'(trivial-types:association-list keyword t))
;;;; Constants
(define-constant fail nil
:documentation "Failure to unify")
(define-constant no-bindings '((:bones-empty-bindings . t))
:test 'equal
:documentation "A succesful unification, with no bindings.")
(defparameter *check-occurs* t
"Whether to perform an occurs check.")
;;;; Unification
(defun* variable-p (term)
(:returns boolean)
"Return whether the given term is a logic variable."
(and (symbolp term)
(equal (char (symbol-name term) 0)
#\?)))
(defun* get-binding ((variable logic-variable)
(bindings binding-list))
(:returns (or binding null))
"Return the binding (var . val) for the given variable, or nil."
(assoc variable bindings))
(defun* has-binding ((variable logic-variable)
(bindings binding-list))
(:returns boolean)
(not (null (get-binding variable bindings))))
(defun* binding-variable ((binding binding))
(:returns logic-variable)
"Return the variable part of a binding."
(car binding))
(defun* binding-value ((binding binding))
"Return the value part of a binding."
(cdr binding))
(defun* lookup ((variable logic-variable)
(bindings binding-list))
"Return the value the given variable is bound to."
(binding-value (get-binding variable bindings)))
(defun* extend-bindings ((variable logic-variable)
(value t)
(bindings binding-list))
(:returns binding-list)
"Add a binding (var . val) to the binding list (nondestructively)."
(cons (cons variable value)
(if (and (equal bindings no-bindings))
nil
bindings)))
(defun* check-occurs ((variable logic-variable)
(target t)
(bindings binding-list))
(:returns boolean)
"Check whether the variable occurs somewhere in the target.
Takes the bindings into account. This is expensive.
"
(cond
;; If the target is this variable, then yep.
((eql variable target) t)
;; The empty list doesn't contain anything.
((null target) nil)
;; The the target is a (different) variable that has a binding, we need to
;; check if the variable occurs in its bindings.
((and (variable-p target)
(get-binding target bindings))
(check-occurs variable (lookup target bindings) bindings))
;; If the target is a list, check if any of the elements contain the variable.
((listp target)
(or (check-occurs variable (first target) bindings)
(check-occurs variable (rest target) bindings)))
;; Otherwise we're safe.
(t nil)))
(defun unify (x y &optional (bindings no-bindings))
"Unify the two terms and return bindings necessary to do so (or FAIL)."
(flet ((unify-variable
(variable target bindings)
(cond
;; If we've already got a binding for this variable, we can try to
;; unify its value with the target.
((get-binding variable bindings)
(unify (lookup variable bindings) target bindings))
;; If the target is ALSO a variable, and it has a binding, then we
;; can unify this variable with the target's value.
((and (variable-p target) (get-binding target bindings))
(unify variable (lookup target bindings) bindings))
;; If this variable occurs in the target (including in something
;; in its bindings) and we're checking occurrence, bail.
((and *check-occurs* (check-occurs variable target bindings))
fail)
;; Otherwise we can just bind this variable to the target.
(t (extend-bindings variable target bindings)))))
(cond
;; Pass failures through.
((eq bindings fail) fail)
;; Trying to unify two identical objects (constants or variables) can just
;; return the bindings as-is.
;;
;; ex: (unify :y :y) or (unify 'foo 'foo)
((eql x y) bindings)
;; Unifying a variable with something.
((variable-p x) (unify-variable x y bindings))
((variable-p y) (unify-variable y x bindings))
;; Unifying a non-variable with nil should fail, except for nil itself.
;; But that was handled with (eql x y).
((or (null x) (null y)) fail)
;; Unifying non-empty compound terms such as
;; (likes :x cats) with (likes sally :y).
((and (listp x) (listp y))
(unify (rest x) (rest y) ; Unify the tails with the bindings gotten from...
(unify (first x) (first y) bindings))) ; unifying the heads.
;; Otherwise we're looking at different constants, or a constant and a
;; compound term, so just give up.
(t fail))))
;;;; Substitution
(defun* substitute-bindings ((bindings binding-list)
(form t))
"Substitute (recursively) the bindings into the given form."
(cond ((eq bindings fail) fail)
((eq bindings no-bindings) form)
((and (variable-p form) (get-binding form bindings))
(substitute-bindings bindings
(lookup form bindings)))
((listp form)
(mapcar (curry #'substitute-bindings bindings) form))
(t form)))
(defun unifier (x y)
"Unify x with y and substitute in the bindings to get the result."
(substitute-bindings (unify x y) x))
;;;; Database
;;; A clause is an assertion in the database. There are two types.
;;;
;;; A fact is the "base" clause:
;;;
;;; (likes kim cats)
;;;
;;; A rule is a way to deduce new facts from existing information:
;;;
;;; ((likes sally :x)
;;; (likes :x cats))
;;;
;;; Clauses are stored as lists. The head is the first item in the list, and
;;; it's "the thing you're trying to prove". You prove it by proving all the
;;; things in the tail of the list. For facts the tail is empty, so they are
;;; trivially proven.
;;;
;;; A predicate is the named head of a part of a clause. In `(likes sally :x)`
;;; the predicate is `likes`.
;;;
;;; Predicates are stored in the plists of their symbols, which is a little
;;; insane, but it's how Norvig did it so I'll do it like this for now.
(defvar *db-predicates* nil
"A list of all the predicates in the database.")
(defconstant clause-key 'bones.paip-clauses
"The key to use in the symbol plist for the clauses.")
(defun clause-head (clause)
(first clause))
(defun clause-body (clause)
(rest clause))
(defun get-clauses (pred)
(get pred clause-key))
(defun set-clauses (pred clauses)
(setf (get pred clause-key) clauses))
(defun predicate (relation)
(first relation))
(defun add-clause (clause)
(let ((pred (predicate (clause-head clause))))
(assert (and (symbolp pred)
(not (variable-p pred))))
(pushnew pred *db-predicates*)
(set-clauses pred
(nconc (get-clauses pred) (list clause)))
pred))
(defmacro rule (&rest clause)
`(add-clause ',clause))
(defmacro fact (&rest body)
`(add-clause '(,body)))
(defun clear-predicate (predicate)
(setf (get predicate clause-key) nil))
(defun clear-db ()
(mapc #'clear-predicate *db-predicates*))
(defun unique-find-anywhere-if (predicate tree &optional acc)
(if (atom tree)
(if (funcall predicate tree)
(adjoin tree acc)
acc)
(unique-find-anywhere-if predicate
(first tree)
(unique-find-anywhere-if predicate (rest tree) acc))))
(defun variables-in (expr)
(unique-find-anywhere-if #'variable-p expr))
(defun rename-variables (form)
"Replace all variables in the form with new (unique) ones."
(sublis (mapcar #'(lambda (variable)
(cons variable (gensym (string variable))))
(variables-in form))
form))
(defun prove-single-clause (goal bindings clause)
(let ((new-clause (rename-variables clause)))
(prove-all (clause-body new-clause)
(unify goal (clause-head new-clause) bindings))))
(defun prove (goal bindings)
;; We look up all the possible clauses for the goal and try proving
;; each individually. Each one will give us back a list of possible
;; solutions.
;;
;; Then we concatenate the results to return all the possible
;; solutions.
(mapcan (curry #'prove-single-clause goal bindings)
(get-clauses (predicate goal))))
(defun prove-all (goals bindings)
"Returns a list of solutions to the conjunction of goals."
(cond
;; If something failed further up the pipeline, bail here.
((eq bindings fail) fail)
;; If there's nothing to prove, it's vacuously true. Return a list of the
;; bindings as the result.
((null goals) (list bindings))
;; Otherwise we try to prove the first thing in the list. This gives us
;; back a list of possible bindings we could use.
;;
;; For each possible solution to the head, we try using it to prove the
;; rest of the goals and concatenate all the results. Failed attempts are
;; represented as FAIL which is nil, so will collapse in the concatenation.
(t (mapcan #'(lambda (possible-solution)
(prove-all (rest goals) possible-solution))
(prove (first goals) bindings)))))
(defun show-variables (variables solution)
(if (null variables)
(format t "~&Yes")
(dolist (var variables)
(format t "~&~A = ~A"
var (substitute-bindings solution var))))
(princ ";"))
(defun clean-variables (variables solution)
(mapcar #'(lambda (var)
(cons var (substitute-bindings solution var)))
variables))
(defun show-solutions (variables solutions)
(if (null solutions)
(format t "~&No.")
(mapc (curry #'show-variables variables)
solutions))
(values))
(defun clean-solutions (variables solutions)
(mapcar (curry #'clean-variables variables)
solutions))
(defun top-level-prove (goals)
(show-solutions
(variables-in goals)
(prove-all goals no-bindings)))
(defun top-level-find (goals)
(clean-solutions
(variables-in goals)
(prove-all goals no-bindings)))
(defmacro query (&rest goals)
`(top-level-prove ',goals))
(defmacro find-all (&rest goals)
`(top-level-find ',goals))