author |
Steve Losh <steve@stevelosh.com> |
date |
Wed, 08 Feb 2023 21:27:09 -0500 |
parents |
b51a18850dc5 |
children |
(none) |
(in-package :losh.eldritch-horrors)
(defmacro with-flexible-accessors (slot-entries instance-form &rest body)
(with-gensyms (instance)
`(let ((,instance ,instance-form))
(declare (ignorable ,instance))
(symbol-macrolet
,(iterate (for (symbol accessor) :in slot-entries)
(collect `(,symbol (,accessor ,instance))))
,@body))))
(defmacro define-with-macro (type-and-options &rest slots)
"Define a with-`type` macro for the given `type` and `slots`.
This new macro wraps `with-accessors` so you don't have to type `type-`
a billion times.
The given `type` must be a symbol naming a struct or class. It must have the
appropriate accessors with names exactly of the form `type`-`slot`.
The defined macro will look something like this:
(define-with-macro foo a b)
=>
(defmacro with-foo ((foo &optional (a-symbol 'a) (b-symbol 'b))
&body body)
`(with-accessors ((,a-symbol foo-a) (,b-symbol foo-b))
,foo
,@body))
There's a lot of magic here, but it cuts down on boilerplate for simple things
quite a lot.
Example:
(defstruct foo x y)
(define-with-macro foo x y)
(defparameter *f* (make-foo :x 10 :y 20))
(defparameter *g* (make-foo :x 555 :y 999))
(with-foo (*f*)
(with-foo (*g* gx gy)
(print (list x y gx gy))))
=>
(10 20 555 999)
"
(destructuring-bind (type &key conc-name)
(ensure-list type-and-options)
(let* ((accessors (loop :for slot :in slots
:collect (if conc-name (symb conc-name slot) slot)))
(symbol-args (loop :for slot :in slots
:collect (symb slot '-symbol)))
(macro-name (symb 'with- type))
(macro-arglist `((,type &optional
,@(loop :for slot :in slots
:for arg :in symbol-args
:collect `(,arg ',slot)))
&body body))
(accessor-binding-list (loop :for arg :in symbol-args
:for accessor :in accessors
:collect ``(,,arg ,',accessor))))
`(defmacro ,macro-name ,macro-arglist
`(with-flexible-accessors ,,`(list ,@accessor-binding-list)
,,type
,@body)))))
(defmacro eval-dammit (&body body)
"Just evaluate `body` all the time, jesus christ lisp."
`(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) ,@body))
(defmacro scratch% (&body forms)
(assert (not (null forms)) () "Malformed scratch block, missing final expr.")
(destructuring-bind (head . forms) forms
(cond
((null forms) head)
((eql head :mv) (destructuring-bind (symbols expr . forms) forms
`(multiple-value-bind ,symbols ,expr
(scratch% ,@forms))))
((eql head :db) (destructuring-bind (bindings expr . forms) forms
`(destructuring-bind ,bindings ,expr
(scratch% ,@forms))))
((symbolp head) (destructuring-bind (expr . forms) forms
`(let ((,head ,expr))
(scratch% ,@forms))))
(t `(progn ,head (scratch% ,@forms))))))
(defmacro scratch (&body forms)
"Evaluate `forms` in an imperative fashion.
Each expression in `forms` will be evaluated, with the following exceptions:
* A bare symbol will be bound via (nested) `let` to the next expression.
* `:mv` will bind the next expression (which must be a list of symbols) to the
expression after it with `multiple-value-bind`.
* `:db` will bind the next expression (which must be a valid binding) to the
expression after it with `destructuring-bind`.
Example:
(scratch
a 10
b 20
c (+ a b)
:mv (d e) (truncate 100 23)
:db (f (g)) (list 100 (list 22))
(+ a (- b c) d e (* f g)))
"
;; Similar to `bb` described here:
;; https://blog.rongarret.info/2023/01/lisping-at-jpl-revisited.html
`(block nil (scratch% ,@forms)))