9863cffa35e8
Update
author | Steve Losh <steve@stevelosh.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:20:14 -0500 |
parents | df4a3f3a486a |
children | b22873b17809 |
branches/tags | (none) |
files | README.markdown |
Changes
--- a/README.markdown Mon Feb 10 20:14:08 2020 -0500 +++ b/README.markdown Tue Feb 11 20:20:14 2020 -0500 @@ -690,3 +690,20 @@ is fucking lying — what's actually on the graph is `log_10(FPKM+1)`. Once I plugged that in, everything works and the graph looks roughly like theirs. To hell with all this, I'm done for tonight. + +## 2020-02-11 + +Class today. Chatted about various stuff. The XLOC identifiers aren't actual +identifiers, they're just arbitrary IDs generated during the alignment process. +That explains why I was seeing `0`s when trying to plot the `XLOC_012662`, which +was regucalcin in the paper — it's a different gene in my run, so I'd need to +look up the gene in my own results. Also talked about P and Q values, and +plotting each to find interesting cutoffs. I really need to refresh my memory +on how to more easily make histograms in gnuplot. + +Started reading [A Curious Moon](https://bigmachine.io/products/a-curious-moon/) +and got about 1/3 of the way through. An interesting approach to teaching SQL, +though the writing voice is a little bit annoying. Still turning out to be +a good book though. + +