68e5bf097fd5
Update
| author | Steve Losh <steve@stevelosh.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 24 May 2019 12:04:57 -0400 |
| parents | 51827548700f |
| children | bcc7d6ca4ad3 |
| branches/tags | (none) |
| files | README.markdown |
Changes
--- a/README.markdown Thu May 23 10:48:09 2019 -0400 +++ b/README.markdown Fri May 24 12:04:57 2019 -0400 @@ -632,3 +632,11 @@ ## 2019-05-23 There are no polydivisible numbers in base `41`. The search continues. + +## 2019-05-24 + +There are no polydivisible numbers in base `42` (what a shame). Once again, +even bases finish an order of magnitude faster than odd bases, and so far only +even bases work. I'm going to focus the search on the next couple of even bases +to save time. I wish I could figure out *why* even bases were more promising. +Or just a better way to search.