# HG changeset patch
# User Steve Losh
# Date 1267383772 18000
# Node ID f9e39b84a2b1819815e8296c91a3c7346992add8
# Parent 47af9cd757ff18649a00018a8b1485d5d20e3c31
Add the "Branching as Needed" entry and refactor some HTML/CSS/blocks.
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 DESIGN.mdown
--- a/DESIGN.mdown Sat Feb 27 17:10:49 2010 -0500
+++ b/DESIGN.mdown Sun Feb 28 14:02:52 2010 -0500
@@ -3,4 +3,10 @@
Images
======
-Full images for posts should be 600 pixels wide (or less).
\ No newline at end of file
+Full images for posts should be 600 pixels wide (or less).
+
+Headers
+=======
+
+Blog and project content block should use h2 and lower. h1 elements are
+reserved for the layout.
\ No newline at end of file
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 content/blog/2009/08/a-guide-to-branching-in-mercurial.html
--- a/content/blog/2009/08/a-guide-to-branching-in-mercurial.html Sat Feb 27 17:10:49 2010 -0500
+++ b/content/blog/2009/08/a-guide-to-branching-in-mercurial.html Sun Feb 28 14:02:52 2010 -0500
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
categories: ["programming"]
%}
-{% block article %}
+{% block article_class %}with-diagrams{% endblock %}
-
+{% block article %}
I've been hanging out in the [#mercurial][hg-irc] and [#bitbucket][bb-irc]
channels on freenode a lot lately, and I've noticed a topic that comes up a
@@ -402,6 +402,4 @@
the git side of things (I don't use git any more than I have to) or have any
questions please let me know!
-
-
{% endblock %}
\ No newline at end of file
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 content/blog/2010/02/mercurial-workflows-branch-as-needed.html
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/content/blog/2010/02/mercurial-workflows-branch-as-needed.html Sun Feb 28 14:02:52 2010 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+{% extends "_post.html" %}
+
+{% hyde
+ title: "Mercurial Workflows: Branch As Needed"
+ snip: "Part 1 of several."
+ created: 2010-02-28 14:00:00
+ categories: ["programming"]
+%}
+
+{% block article_class %}with-diagrams{% endblock %}
+
+{% block article %}
+
+A while ago [Vincent Driessen][] posted an example of [a successful git
+branching model][gitbranch]. A lot of git users found that article very
+helpful, and [Dirkjan Ochtman][] [told me][djctweet] I should write a similar
+article for Mercurial users.
+
+[Vincent Driessen]: http://nvie.com/
+[gitbranch]: http://nvie.com/git-model
+[Dirkjan Ochtman]: http://dirkjan.ochtman.nl/
+[djctweet]: http://twitter.com/djco/status/8061889499
+
+I decided that I didn't want to just write a single entry about one branching
+workflow. Mercurial is flexible enough to support many different workflows and
+some of them will fit a given project better than others. Instead I'm going to
+write a series of posts, each one about a particular workflow.
+
+I'm going to start off with the simplest example I can think of: "Don't worry
+about branching at all, just deal with it whenever it happens."
+
+**Note:** In this series I'm going to assume you're comfortable with basic
+Mercurial commands and you know how Mercurial's various forms of branching
+work. If you need some review on Mercurial's commands you should look at the
+[hg book][]. If you need more information on branching concepts you might like
+my [Guide to Branching in Mercurial][hgbranching].
+
+[hg book]: http://hgbook.red-bean.com/
+[hgbranching]: /blog/2009/08/a-guide-to-branching-in-mercurial/
+
+[TOC]
+
+"Branch as Needed" In a Nutshell
+--------------------------------
+
+The general idea of this workflow is that you don't worry about branching
+until it actually happens.
+
+The benefit is that it takes no extra work up front and keeps things very
+simple.
+
+The drawback is that it doesn't scale very well. It's great for small projects
+but it for larger ones you'll probably want something a bit more structured.
+
+An Example Scenario
+-------------------
+
+This workflow is most suited to small projects. Here's a sample repository
+with only a single, linear series of changes:
+
+![Sample Repository Diagram](/media/images{{ parent_url }}/hg-branching-1-start.png "Sample Repository")
+
+In this example there's mostly just a single developer (you) working on the
+project to add features, fix bugs, etc.
+
+The repository is online so other people can get the code. They can add
+features and fix bugs if they want, but it doesn't happen very often because
+it's a small project.
+
+**Note:** I find it helpful to have graphs of the changesets in a repository
+so I can see what's going on. If you want some nice, quick ASCII-art graphs of
+your own repositories you can [use the graphlog extension][glog].
+
+[glog]: http://hgtip.com/tips/beginner/2009-10-03-stay-sane-with-graphlog/
+
+Branch Setup
+------------
+
+In this workflow you don't do any up-front setup at all. Just use Mercurial as
+you normally would, committing your changes along the way and pushing them to
+somewhere where other people can get them (like [BitBucket][]).
+
+[BitBucket]: http://bitbucket.org/
+
+Contributing to the Project
+---------------------------
+
+Let's say someone else starts using your project and finds a bug. They go
+ahead and fix the bug themselves and commit a changeset for the fix. They
+could then push their copy of the repository to somewhere public (like their
+own BitBucket account) and it would look something like this:
+
+![Contributor Repository Diagram](/media/images{{ parent_url }}/hg-branching-1-other.png "Contributor Repository")
+
+Once their changes are somewhere public they can email you and say:
+
+> Hey, I fixed a bug in your project.
+>
+> The fix is changeset be3063198fea in my copy of your repository at
+> http://.../
+
+Merging Changes from Contributors
+---------------------------------
+
+When you get an email like this you would head over to their repository and
+take a look at the changeset. If you decide it's good and want to incorporate
+it into your own repository it's as simple as running `hg pull
+http://their/repo/`.
+
+If you haven't made any new changes your repository would now look exactly
+like theirs. You can update to the new tip and continue working as usual.
+
+What if you've made changes between the time they cloned (or last pulled) your
+repository and the time you read the email & pulled their changes? In that
+case your repository will look like this after you pull from them:
+
+![Sample Repository Before Merging Diagram](/media/images{{ parent_url }}/hg-branching-1-needs-merge.png "Sample Repository Before Merging")
+
+Because John's bugfix changeset and your refactoring changeset both have the
+same parent there are now two "anonymous branches" in your repository. This
+doesn't bother Mercurial at all -- repositories can have as many "anonymous
+branches" as you like.
+
+You'll probably want to merge these branches, so you'd run `hg update
+a2125cb20c54` (if you weren't already there) and then `hg merge be3063198fea`
+to merge John's bugfix with your new changes. The result would look like this:
+
+![Sample Repository After Merging Diagram](/media/images{{ parent_url }}/hg-branching-1-after-merge.png "Sample Repository After Merging")
+
+Now you're back to having just one head and you can continue working as usual,
+with John's changes and your changes all merged together.
+
+Summary
+-------
+
+This workflow is the simplest one possible. There's no up-front setup and it's
+very easy for new people to contribute to the project -- they just clone,
+commit, push, and tell you about their changes. It's great for small projects
+with one main developer and the occasional contributor.
+
+If you have a project with a lot of people working together this can get
+pretty chaotic. Your repository graph will end up looking like a tangled mess.
+In that case you'll want a workflow with a bit more structure.
+
+I'm planning on writing at least two or three more posts about some more
+complicated branching workflows in the future. If you have any specific
+examples you think I should write about please let me know!
+
+{% endblock %}
\ No newline at end of file
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 layout/_post.html
--- a/layout/_post.html Sat Feb 27 17:10:49 2010 -0500
+++ b/layout/_post.html Sun Feb 28 14:02:52 2010 -0500
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
-
+
{% filter typogrify %}
{% article %}
{% filter typogrify %}
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 media/css/base.less
--- a/media/css/base.less Sat Feb 27 17:10:49 2010 -0500
+++ b/media/css/base.less Sun Feb 28 14:02:52 2010 -0500
@@ -258,13 +258,13 @@
margin-bottom: 1.5em;
margin-right: 1.5em;
}
- div.with-diagrams img {
- display: block;
- margin-left: auto;
- margin-right: auto;
- background: none;
- border: none;
- }
+}
+div#leaf-content.with-diagrams img {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ background: none;
+ border: none;
}
/* Comment styles. */
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 media/images/blog/2010/02/hg-branching-1-after-merge.png
Binary file media/images/blog/2010/02/hg-branching-1-after-merge.png has changed
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 media/images/blog/2010/02/hg-branching-1-needs-merge.png
Binary file media/images/blog/2010/02/hg-branching-1-needs-merge.png has changed
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 media/images/blog/2010/02/hg-branching-1-other.png
Binary file media/images/blog/2010/02/hg-branching-1-other.png has changed
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 media/images/blog/2010/02/hg-branching-1-start.png
Binary file media/images/blog/2010/02/hg-branching-1-start.png has changed
diff -r 47af9cd757ff -r f9e39b84a2b1 requirements.txt
--- a/requirements.txt Sat Feb 27 17:10:49 2010 -0500
+++ b/requirements.txt Sun Feb 28 14:02:52 2010 -0500
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
-e git://github.com/bitprophet/fabric.git@0.9rc2#egg=fabric
-e svn+http://typogrify.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/#egg=typogrify
-e svn+http://svn.cherrypy.org/tags/cherrypy-3.2.0rc1#egg=cherrypy
+-e git://gitorious.org/python-markdown/mainline.git#egg=markdown
pyYAML
-markdown
smartypants
Pygments
PIL
\ No newline at end of file